A US appeals court has struck down a government policy that banned the broadcasting of profanity, ruling that the rule is unconstitutional.
The policy was drawn up in 2004 and meant that broadcasters could be fined if indecent words went on air.
The court said the FCC's (Federal Communications Commission) policy had a "chilling effect" on broadcasters.
The many media outlets that challenged the rule said that they were satisfied with the ruling.
The court said banning all "patently offensive" references to sex, sexual organs and excretion without a clear definition of what is considered offensive, effectively chills speech and creates an atmosphere of fear among America's broadcasters.
FCC commissioner Michael Copps called the court's decision "anti-family" and said the commission would "clarify and strengthen its indecency framework".
- Govt blocking me from registering political party - Bwalya
- Govt won't close any learning institution over protests - Sata
- Sata is a great man - Mugabe
- Mpombo joins 2016 presidential race
- Beating a wife is sign of love - GBM
- Subsidies cannot continue - Storella
- Subsidies costly, says Chigunta
- Subsidies bad for economy - Fundanga
- PF cadres thwart Nevers' trip to Kanyama
- Andrew admits negotiating for 2% cut